A 6:47 a.m. email arrives: "We've been served."
Panic instantly grips the in-house legal team.
Where’s the data? Who has the Slack exports? Has anyone secured the shared Google Drive folder before HR cuts off the former employee's access?
All good questions…
…that should’ve been asked a lot sooner.
Litigation moves fast. Courts don’t wait for organizations to get their digital house in order. That’s why smart law firms are urging their clients, and preparing their own internal systems, to develop litigation readiness plans that include detailed eDiscovery protocols before the subpoenas arrive.
Here’s what that looks like, and why it matters.
When eDiscovery isn't planned for in advance, the scramble is expensive. Missed preservation opportunities can lead to sanctions. Inefficient data collection can drive up review costs. And worst of all, critical evidence might be lost or become inadmissible.
In one case, a midsize healthcare provider was hit with a class action lawsuit over data privacy violations. The provider had no centralized retention policy, and employees stored sensitive files across multiple personal devices and cloud accounts. It took weeks just to map where the relevant data might live and the opposing side filed a motion for spoliation before discovery even began.
Compare that to a client who’s prepared: With a documented data map, clear roles, and a repeatable preservation process, legal holds are triggered immediately, and responsive data is collected efficiently and defensibly.
Litigation readiness isn’t a binder on a shelf. It’s a living, repeatable process with three key components:
It’s not just clients who need to prepare. Law firms themselves often store sensitive and discoverable data including client communications, shared work product, internal notes, often across multiple systems. A rogue associate with synced notes on a personal device could become an unexpected source of data exposure.
In a recent breach investigation, a law firm was found to have no centralized policy for how discovery data was stored or accessed post-case. When a former paralegal was subpoenaed in a related matter, they still had access to old client materials on their laptop, raising questions about privilege and data governance.
Law firms that handle litigation must practice what they preach: apply legal holds internally, document collection workflows, and regularly audit data retention practices.
When litigation hits a prepared organization, everything changes:
For example, a software company had built a litigation readiness plan after a prior incident. When hit with a patent dispute two years later, they had data maps, preservation policies, and legal hold workflows ready. As a result, the discovery process wrapped in a fraction of the time and at a third of the cost compared to their previous case.
Readiness doesn’t just protect against loss. It saves time, money, and your client’s credibility.
Building a litigation readiness plan isn’t just an IT project. It’s a legal risk strategy. And the best time to start is when there’s no deadline looming.
At Blackfish Intelligence, we help law firms and their clients assess their current eDiscovery posture, identify weak points, and design readiness plans that hold up under pressure—and in court.
Not sure if your plan is defensible? Don’t wait for litigation to find out.
Schedule a free consultation with Blackfish Intelligence and get a practical roadmap for getting ahead of the next subpoena.